I still haven't understood why they have not reported the purity of the LiOH, but instead have used the greater than sign.
And what about the competitor's LiOH purity? Are we supposed to assume there is an implied greater than sign for their purity also? Because in tbe left hand column heading it says LiOH (% min)
This all seems a bit odd to me. If the sample has been assayed then why can't they report the actual result.
lpd share price, page-3986
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12,683 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LPD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.17M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.1¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.1¢ | $9.476K | 5.380M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | 169328494 | 0.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2¢ | 28674554 | 25 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.51pm 07/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LPD (ASX) Chart |