Nothing has changed, page-145

I find it amazing that after all the build up about Pareto and what their DD meant, that there is no WKT funding.. We were told time and time again, that it was in the bag... That the great Pareto, lord of Nordic Bonds would wave a magic wand and financiers would flock from far and wide to partake the Pareto offerings. After all, its their credibility and reputation stamped and attached to the DD.

OzNT stated......."When Pareto completes their DD on our World Class Project it will have their reputation and creditability stamped and attached to WKT and the Lindi Jumbo Graphite Project."
SparkyR...."Many months of due diligence has lead to this point. Pareto Security now backs this project to its investors as it has done all the DD and spent all the money to do so,so it can confidently present a solid investment to it's funding network....basically it's funded, we just don't know the terms yet.'

Posters who pointed out otherwise were ridiculed consistently.

Cap was told..."Capraise you know less and less each day and your calls are worthless, pointless gibberish, nonsense at best "

Oznt posted..." hahahahaahahahaha OMG - You still don't get it lol.

Due Diligence has been completed and by an Investment Bank that pioneered the Nordic Bond Market.

ESSENTIAL READING : )

https://www.paretosec.com/download/Intro to Pareto Securities.pdf

They do sizeable deals quite quickly once their DD is complete.

https://www.pareto.no/en/reports

Worth Reading the Pareto 2018 AGM Report

https://www.pareto.no/resources/pareto-as/arsrapporter/engelske-versjoner/Pareto_Annual-Report_2018.pdf"

Of course there are hundreds more posts that could be included, but indicative is fine..

I guess my questions are... Where is the funding?... why do the board require up to another three months to secure funding.??? If Pareto deals are done quite quickly after DD, why hasn't any financier been interested in the Loan Notes.?
Does this mean that all the posters that were overly confident of funding and abused anyone who thought differently were completely and totally wrong.?

Should posters apologise for misleading the forum.?

After all, I have been repeatedly told on here that if you mislead, then its a lie.