Seriously, it's like talking to a demented, attention deficit duck
I'll use big font too, if we are playing that game !!
Maybe that's your problem
Scientific proof isn't pointing to a video and saying "look! look! she said!! she said!!"
Read the report !
It means NOTHING if you don't understand it.
From the report, here is a table, the letters at the bottom in parenthesis "()" represent a code. There were 4 different placebos used. 3 adjuvants 1 saline.
It says so.
I'm showing it in yellow.
Am I typing slow enough?
So Study 018, aka Protocol 018, is done with Saline Placebo. They do say so.
....and look, heres the bigger picture....
...and one more for good measure
It's all perfectly consistent. No tricks. No conspiracy.
and another study, saline placebo. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17484215
Lotsa examples. Along with the post-licensure studies, it's pretty damn good proof --
There are double blind inert placebo studies of Gardasil
There are large cohort follow up studies spanning many years for gardasil also
