I notice you don't respond to the facts i referred to by a 'scientist'.? I like hansons response to yr question when pushed by tom on sky tv about the hazard reduction attitude by councils and lets include state govts whether burn offs or physical reduction and tom pressured hanson to name councils,she said on live tv those that had an issue with such hazard reduction requests phone tom on sky tv and name the councils.? Stupid question but clearly on the climate change extremists lists of replies. Reason,it doesn't matter how much u try and sugar coat the fires its the build up of fuel from leaves /branches that has been going on for almost decades which has resulted in current catastrophic combination of eucaliptos gums and years of hazard reduction neglect plus maintaining access. Dealing with the climate change extremists is difficult because yr dealing with various groups within the cult that have different agendas whether,marxism who during protests u clearly see the banners or the repulsive elite climate change supporters that for example only believe the rich should fly due to their flying tax policy and then we have the spoilt little kids that have been brought up in wealthy australia and can afford to protest and b taught by their left wing pro climate change teachers. Send them to russia or bangladesh then let then come back and express their views. I hope the bs royal commission will present all the facts and make the situation clear and not just let the legal system drain the taxes paid by 'working' australians. Maybe we could agree on the stuffed up legal system we have ie if yr mega rich u win,if yr poor maybe u win,if yr middle class u loose.
