GXY galaxy resources limited

Banter and General Comments, page-14019

  1. 5,095 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2207
    Fair enough regarding their lack of willingness to "sell us out". At this point though it's very difficult to know whether that was a good or bad decision. I'm sure it was the right decision at the time with the information at hand, but hindsight shows that it may have been a better option to lower expectations. If GXY had capitulated and entered a JV arrangement for less than what management considered fair value, it is still likely that they could have achieved a high enough sale price to fully fund the originally planned 25ktpa operation. Even at 50% ownership, 12.5ktpa of battery grade carbonate is preferable to the ~8-10ktpa of primary grade carbonate that will be funded by SDV stage 1.

    IMO we'll eventually be looking for a JV partner regardless of whether we manage to progress stage 1 without one. SDV stage 1 and Mt Cattlin will not be sufficiently profitable to fund SDV stage 2 and 3 (let alone JB); therefore, a JV moving forward is a must. I'm confident that the offers that were previously put forward for a SDV JV would have been more competitive than the offers that we a likely to receive from this point forward.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.