Still doesn't explain the discrepancy in the figures.
Naked shorts at 19/9/08 = 2.8 mil
Total shorts (naked+covered) at 22/9/08 = 1.0 mil
minimum change in short position is still 1.8 mil. If the 19/9/08 figures also included covered shorts, the difference would probably have been even greater.
Why the change in the basis of reporting? Deliberate obfuscation?
Anyway, how would the ASX know the level of covered short sales (direct, via CFDs, other methods)?
- Forums
- ASX - General
- shorts closed on monday
shorts closed on monday, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)