mjp you were in denial. I showed it , you then acknowledged it. But But but but but but but you now have changed tune and provided ONE paper to back up my claim that NASA and NOAA climate models use FLAT EARTH theory as climate forcings for their models.
I say a BIG THANK YOU for acknowledging this!
You then later state that it does not matter because in your ONE paper they claim it is ONLY two Watts / M 2 as per the settled science is concerned.
You however conveniently ignore the fact that from the AR4 to AR5 the settled science change climate feedback. Further diluted the SUNS impact on the Earths surface by 8W m2 and then increased the imaginery feedback by a WHOPPING 16W m2
Yeah mjp your science HAS always been ROCK SOLID. Lol
I get a STRONG sense that you are dissolving yourself from this discussion.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- IPCC energy budget logic and then the real World
IPCC energy budget logic and then the real World, page-131
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 39 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)