Nature is certainly a reliable source... but this was published 2016 and is unrelated to this mutation of corona virus.
I am quite biased when it comes to sources of information and won't go near Hairy's link as I don't trust where it may take me. I just as leery of computer viruses, advertising links etc as I am about physical viruses.
So did you click Hairy's link? and what did you find? Was it worth the effort?
