Share
9,924 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 3839
clock Created with Sketch.
04/03/20
13:03
Share
"The White Box" This will be interesting. Id ask what it means but I suspect you got it wrong and wont answer. Im guessing you meant "White paper"? The rest you have raised was an event of almost a year ago and has been concluded. The resultant efforts in objection by Dr Mair concluded with GGG recieving increased processing times and a simplistic step by step (type 1/2) requirement process to be fulfilled for GGGs EIAs acceptance. Something GBB was very happy to benifit from and thankful for Dr Mairs awesome efforts to have arranged such a startling result.
Originally posted by dull1122:
↑
Jack, talk about not reading. you think the EIA is the final hurdle? well the non, or post final hurdles like the Full Public Meetings, The IBA, The White Box and then the negotiated Gov agreements, to name just a few. Count on those taking at least three years after EIA approval if all goes at light speed. If not it can be between 3 to 5years, if things go wrong it could be 10 years, or never granted. There is serious opposition the GML because of all the foolish which could generate a lot of community resistance which could be a problem. Take this example from the Greenlandic Paper Sermitsiaq see https://sermitsiaq.aq/naalakkersuisutmineselselskabs-lobbyarbejde-uacceptabelt From Friday September 13th 2019, no37. "Greenland minerals has since the beginning been reckless" "It is incredable that Greenland Minerals (GML) and their investors right since the start has fought for to sway the population remarkably. During the last couple years they used dirty maneuvers to sway the public servants in the different departments. For someone who would like to profit well from a mine at Kuannersuit, that is owned by the society, are behaving so badly in their effort for their aim. We agree with the Prime Minister that it is unacceptable that GML try to reach permissions by ignoring the country's regulations, which we are working from. If that perhaps the proof of how GML will not care with everything if they should get permission now? They do everthing what they can to reach permissions by trying to sway the individual public servants and ignoring Naalakkersuisut (Greenland government), who abide by the regulations. Inuit Ataqatigiit require that you definitely tell no to respectless companies, especially when you talk about important subjects such as activities that can have a destructing effect on nature and animal life. We are happy that the Prime minister shows responsibility by following the legislation on the environment area and protecting the animal life. of course this must be the practice. This letter to the editor was written by the deputy leader of IA (Inuit Ataqatigiit) which is the opposition party by their deputy leader Aqqaluaq B. Egede. GML's actions, as he says angered the opposition party because of their actions trying to subvert the rules and processes of the EIA process and the mining licensing process so that He wrote this letter agreeing with a similatr article written by His politacl rival the Prime minister of Greenland that GML's actions not cause them to get approval by subverting the rules as they had. So GML thrugh their actions cased the two heads of the countries biggest political partys to come together to oppose GML from moving forward. Do you think this anger in the community will hurt their chances and draw out the process of licensing because of the companies foolish attempts to circumvent the Government Authorities? This is why I say even if they get the EIA which is not at all a certainty, it will still take years to get through the rest of the licensing process. These are just the facts with the Sermitsiaq article to substantiate what I am saying. Listen to it or block it, that's up to you. You can either see the picture you haven't seen or remain uninformed. Your choice. Ciao
Expand