CGB Price Discussion Thread, page-120

With the greatest of respect - I did answer your question - I think.

If, it wasn't the answer you were anticipating, then there's not a lot more that I can add.

I actually put a lot of time into responding to your question.

In short, I noted that I don't see it as a matter of negative v positive. The difficulty with your question is that you seem to interpret the facts that I post as negative or, maybe even positive, I don't know. However, that's your interpretation and disposition. How you interpret the facts is your decision.

I post facts and my own conclusions. If, something is read as a positive or negative, then that, it seems to me, is a matter for the individual.

For example, accumulated losses of ~35 million dollars - that's just a fact - you can't change that and neither can I (see HY Report). Some posters might consider that to be a negative and some might argue it is a positive. Either way, that's their call.

As an aside, I would like to see the arguments that promote that as a positive if only to have the chance to learn something new.

So, rather than suggest that I did not answer your question, can I respectfully suggest that you consider the possibility that I rejected the premise of your question and therein tried to find greater clarity on this issue of positive v negative.