annual report now available, page-45

Hi cb
"noticed you were discussing the point about the metamorphism of MtC, WW and Vital."

Yes I was going to do a bit of checking up on that because I considered that it was just identifying a difference in the amount of pressure the rocks had undergone and therfore the degree to which they had been metamorphosed or changed from their original(before) state to the new (after) state.
Was not sure how that may have influenced the nature of the tungsten. In other words if the rock had undergone more metamorphism (= higher grade metamorphosed rock) did that mean it would have higher grade tungsten.

What your saying is that metamorphic grades have no correlation to the quality of the tungsten deposits.

Now I haven't read your link yet but I will.

So the comment in the Annual Report about the comparative grades of metamorphic rock at different prospects is just a comment to indicate a possible link in type of rock without any suggestion that one will be beter then the other for tungsten. ???? Did I get that right or have I just confused the issue with that summary ??