I am happy to reduce my interactions with people, if that is what keeps the vulnerable from dying and the health system from being overloaded with Coronavirus patients (it would have been good if it wasn't overloaded from the start).
However, there has to be a limit on how far they shut down the economy. It is what keeps us alive. If the governments went to draconian and killed it, even inadvertently, more people would end up dying from impoverishment and other illnesses, than the Coronavirus, itself.
In other words, they need to careful with the bans they put in place. Furthermore, they can only really be a short term measure, perhaps biding time for a vaccine. Just a thought.
- Forums
- Economics
- Cost of stopping the Coronavirus
Cost of stopping the Coronavirus
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 206 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)