Draconian enough yet?, page-75

  1. 7,620 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 172

    ‘Since 1990, the classical form of monetarism has been questioned. This is because of events that many economists interpreted as being inexplicable in monetarist terms: the disconnection of the money supply growth from inflation in the 1990s and the failure of pure monetary policy to stimulate the economy in the 2001–2003 period. Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan argued that the 1990s decoupling was explained by a virtuous cycle of productivity and investment on one hand, and a certain degree of "irrational exuberance" in the investment sector on the other.

    There are also arguments that monetarism is a special case of Keynesian theory. The central test case over the validity of these theories would be the possibility of a liquidity trap, like that experienced by Japan. Ben Bernanke, Princeton professor and another former chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, argued that monetary policy could respond to zero interest rate conditions by direct expansion of the money supply. In his words, "We have the keys to the printing press, and we are not afraid to use them."’

    The representatives of the US mentioned in the extract above have been part of a group who have corrupted economics for the wealth of the few. Greenspan and Bernanke are Corrupt and have done it with the best wishes of multiple presidents.

    Monetarism is part of Keynesian theory, they used it for gain and now the world’s systems (first world) have collapsed. It doesn’t work.

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.