NRO
The above post is a new low even for you. You put forward the two Sermitsiaq Articles as though they are relatively current articles articles related to Tanbreez's current licensing situation. You know that one of the articles was published in 2014, six years ago and the other was published in 2015, 5 years ago.
Neither article has any bearing whatsoever on the current status of the Tanbreez Exploitation appllication.
It is a cheap trick to create what you know is a false impression of a problem that was incorrect when the articles were published, but far more important, and potentially liable now, when you knowingly, falsely put them forward today totally out of context, to damage Tanbreez by falsely using the 5 and 6 year old articles to create a false impression of the state of their application today.
You should be barred from HC for this one.
Ciao
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ETM
- Ann: EIA Path to Finalisation
Ann: EIA Path to Finalisation, page-89
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $32.40M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.2¢ | 2.3¢ | 2.2¢ | $758 | 33.74K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 275711 | 2.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.3¢ | 131834 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 275711 | 0.022 |
3 | 680989 | 0.021 |
6 | 3013254 | 0.020 |
1 | 150000 | 0.019 |
2 | 1055610 | 0.018 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.023 | 131834 | 2 |
0.024 | 946233 | 2 |
0.025 | 2302191 | 3 |
0.027 | 1376465 | 3 |
0.028 | 2708 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ETM (ASX) Chart |