Anyone with a basic understanding of statistics and numerical methods would know that when one analyses data of this nature, then one needs to do it based on as broad a basis as possible, in order to avoid the pitfalls of lack of statistical relevance, which is what happens when one cherry picks just a small number of data points (as you have done).
Not just that, but because the number of viral infection and deaths are proportional to population size (self-evidently, the more people in data sample, the more infections and deaths there will be), to remove obvious distortions of population size, one needs to conduct comparisons on
per capita basis.
Here is the result of such a per capita exercise, and using a statistically representative data set [*]:
View attachment 2100424
[*] representing 75% of total global deaths, and 98% of total European deaths
