Trump still winning, page-131

  1. 809 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 76
    "IF indeed - so called "White Privilage" exists, why on earth would any sane White person want to remove it from themselves and their families? - that amounts to self harm and is a totally insane and illogical thing to do "

    That conclusion would hold if equal Human Rights were a diminishing asset who's consumption by an additional unit/person would only arise if another unit/person reduced their consumption of that right. People do not for instance advocate for equal enjoyment of facilities by the disabled in society because they are necessarily inherently beneficiaries of those facilities. Neither did people advocate for the end of slavery because they were all slaves (even though in this particular instance some of those advocating for the elimination of slave trade would incur losses from the loss of cheap sources of labour). The reason such priviledges as 'White Priviledge' if it does exist, would be better off eliminated is because that would result in human beings treating each other on the basis of their characters as individuals and not on the basis of prejudices arising from physical constructs that have nothing to do with defining who we are as people.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.