ASIC’s lashes out on BPNL code of conduct, page-12

it starts with a definition.

apt have continually rejected the 'credit provider' label...they claim to be a marketing engine delivering consumers to merchants via their platform ....

so if we're led to believe apt are now encouraging regulation, these statements need to be clarified.

is apt referring to 'credit provider' regulation ? if so, can they now apologise to the market for misrepresenting their business as being a marketing channel

if apt don't apologise for misrepresenting their business model to the market, particularly to fomo investors, then why should anybody else apologise?

pls

gltah