The essence of the facts, page-571

We have Uralic languages that are over 7000 years old and yet believe in creationist theories
-------------
You gave no references. Here's one I found.
The New Encyclopædia Britannica says: “The earliest records of written language, the only linguistic fossils man can hope to have, go back no more than about 4,000 or 5,000 years.” (1985, Vol. 22, p. 567)

It gets worse for those that think historical evidence supports evolution of humans from apes.
An article in Science Illustrated of July 1948 (p. 63) states: “Older forms of the languages known today were far more difficult than their modern descendants . . . man appears not to have begun with a simple speech, and gradually made it more complex, but rather to have gotten hold of a tremendously knotty speech somewhere in the unrecorded past, and gradually simplified it to the modern forms.”
Wouldn't you expect ancient languages to be formed from grunts and growls if we descended from apes?