Getswift Court Proceedings, page-93

just got to enlighten you a little.
CBA admitted that the number of transactions was a multiple of Albert terminals x transactions.

the number of terminals was badly inaccurate and hence the top line number of transactions was badly inaccurate.

I’m not saying that CBA didn’t give them bad numbers (or sign off on bad numbers), I’m just saying the numbers were bad.

if you want to refute that, then show me the evidence.
i refer you to @notpersonal for a response on NAW