FBR Charts and Technical Analysis, page-569

You're proving my exact point. And how many of those developments occur as a proportion of new buildings? Hadrian might be ideally suited to that exact scenario. But so is every other building technique. Hadrian gets to compete with every building process in those sites. But is excluded from many others.

You're hoping that Hadrian is better and cheaper than every other building process for it to be adopted.

In terms of disaster and aid relief. I suppose you're referring to Hadrians apparent advantages of speed and cost saving? Comparative speed depends on human input. How many humans does it take to build as quickly as Hadrian? Hadrian needs a very flat cured slab and specialised blocks. Sure stacking the blocks is fast, but getting to that point requires a lot of time and organisation and good infrastructure. Then cost, what is the saving? It saves human labour, but what if that human labour is very cheap? And what if the local building materials are far cheaper than manufacturing the blocks and preparing ground and laying a particular spec slab?

Hadrian will be pinning its success on building in well developed economies producing middle class housing.