Share
13,193 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1279
clock Created with Sketch.
27/08/20
08:43
Share
Originally posted by Ebbandflow15
↑
The AFR made some wild accusations that appear to be in conflict with specific clients. Most notably for the homeland: CBA, which confirmed they signed off on the announced numbers.
If your point is about a furniture delivery company, who cares? And if your point is that the larger opportunities were not making money, then that was already conveyed by the company. If that was still a surprise to you, I might question your knowledge of SaaS.
My point is that the AFR is not a reputable publication. Hence why it is free. But you already know this...Perhaps some people that work at the paper don't appreciate their stance?
Expand
Probably the worst part about the coverage is that it was so one sided.
If any deal didn't quite deliver the amount of revenue expected, they were all over it.
But zero coverage of any deals that generated more revenue than expected.
Zero coverage of deals that came out of left field and were not announced which went on to generate revenue.
Business is unpredictable but the AFR only focused on one type of outcome.