Impressive resistance shown, page-49

LOL..

Can you provide a definition on meaningful? I would have thought these guys fit the bill. I won't even touch on the others as I have highlighted the big ones, but the others sure are meaningful (cough...product to be used likely in NASA rockets)

The so called Ford and Valeo 'deals' are just evaluations. These companies sign hundreds of deals like this every year. The chance of a significant contract is minuscule.

A uni mate of mine sold some software to NASA. They paid him $500.

BRN has already given away 35 million shares and offered another 75 million options at a strike price of 12.5 cents. Plus they will be paying $580K in frees. So effectively $46 million in fees (at current prices) to borrow $10 million. The put options are a separate deal which allows 10x the daily trade volume to be borrowed for day trading at no cost and sold back to BRN at a 10% discount. Technically the entire BRN holdings could be borrowed and day traded. I strongly suspect much of the recent activity is due to LDA day trading. [It won't appear in announcements because LDA don't own the shares at any stage.]

BRN had $5 million on June 30. Enough to last six months. Without the line of credit they would not be an ongoing concern and would be at risk of being delisted.

Can you then provide commentary how success = high quality universities?

Talent. The researchers and graduates from the first tier universities are vastly superior to those from the third tier universities. It is the literally the difference between recruiting Brownlow Medallists and kids from the local high school.

Running a shoestring operation from multiple sites doesn't make a company 'global'

BRN is basically repeating research done by Brain Corporation a decade ago. Despite being backed by Qualcomm Brain Corporation achieved nothing practical. It switched focus to making cleaning robots.


Can you explain to intel and others that you are much smarter than them and that they are all wrong about this technology and its outdated and everyone should just stop with this ancient technology? A key extract if you don't want to read these articles:

It is basic research. They are not trying to make a commercial product.
Quote:

"Intel Labs is committed to enabling the research community at large with access to test systems based on Loihi. Because the technology is still in a research phase (as opposed to production), there are only a limited number of Loihi-based test systems in existence; in order to expand access, Intel Labs has developed a cloud-based platform for research community access to scalable Loihi-based infrastructure."

The big companies are not using SNN for commercial operations. eg Facebook manufactures their own Tensor Processing Units for image processing.

You quote some nonsense computer generated (keyword search) 'report' as though it is fact. "Addressable market" is just a BS marketing term. Idiots think that "we only need a 1% of the market" to be make billions. it doesn't work like that. The top two companies typically get around 95-99% of the market. The rest fight over crumbs and struggle to break even.