new sulphide ni hits, page-11

Blythefan

I think you are getting ahead of yourself talking about mining factors etc. Still early days for Cerberus with many open directions.

Also I disagree with your suggestion that being narrow and high-grade is a problem quote:'Look at the facts - it is thin (but high grade), most intersections being under 1m of massive (30cm!), and its structurally disturbed and squirted into pissy little pods.'

Would you rather a much wider low-grade deposit? I doubt it, as it means more tonnes to blow up, move and process, all adding to costs. Sure a wide high-grade deposit would be preferable to a narrow one, but it is what it is. Maybe they just haven't hit the right 'pods' yet with the wide-spaced first pass drilling.

Minimum extraction varies on your equipment, but 30cm is a mineable width provided economics work - just look at some Aussie gold mines. Too early to tell about engineering and geotech properties.