Ann: More Thick Intercepts of Mineralised Units at Mt Alexander, page-44

Morning Helmenesh … many thanks for your response above … Very informative, as usual.

As a layman, I have a simple question for you (or any other of your learned cotary) …

It has been raised before by other(s), but I wonder the same myself …. I have expectations that whenever a drill takes place there will be assays done of the core giving grade percentages of the different metals contained - and at depths and thicknesses. Am I right in assuming this? Sometimes, as in the recent announcements, we get general mention of “mineralisation” and at the depths found e.g. “less than” 5% for example, which is not quite the same thing as 4.5% nickel, 1.2% copper etc. etc. from x to y depth …. Is the absence of such specific grade references due to the fact that assays WERE done, but nothing was clearly identifiable? Is every hole drilled with the view of assaying it?

Cheers and ongoing many thanks J

Kip