2020 BRN Discussion, page-11973

You are absolutely correct however in later communications once the design of AKIDA was in full swing the CEO advised that to keep costs and complexity down for the first AKD1000 design they were only going to run with 64 as the use cases beyond that from a commercialisation point of view did not yet exist. In other words if you want to do something that requires more than 64 AKD1000's ganged together you would just have to wait or come and talk to BRN and pay them lots of money to up the design.

This is my best memory of how this went. The statement may have been made by the CEO in response to questions by Cyberworks as he was from my best recollection the first one to notice the change from 1024 to 64.

My opinion only DYOR