AZY are obviously planning to drill. This slide suggests it has already begun which is probably not the case and possibly not a good thing to show at an important conference. Read the disclaimer slide and everything is covered from a legal and ASX perspective. Not certain that this image can even be shown as it could be viewed in the US or any other prohibited jurisdictions. ======= The mid May drilling is accurate for Citadel. I did think for awhile that the expansion of GAIP near 20-01 was being shown but that is still to come. In addition to some previous musings: From a non geophysicist perspective some comments: [Sorry got carried away...as usual.]
The available GAIP 20-01 seems to be in 3 segments
1 linear 2 Km zone with a relatively sharp high peak and distinct breaks at the ends especially to the south.
2 Kink with possible continuation to the north that will be tested in due course.
3 on same trend as segment 1 but appears to be a separate blip or pimple with a shape like Havieron albeit IP rather than Mag. or Gravity. Significance - check survey parameters to see if it is real; perhaps to be drill tested in due course.
As a vague rule of thumb for some (one?) exploration geos the major structures may bring the goodies up but often it is the second or third order structure where they get deposited. Not certain where I came across this concept or if it is useful. The white stars represent some possible second order targets - geophysicists will know especially if Winu and Ngapakarra are Gaip related. [Winu was apparently an AEM target originally and I would expect every form of geophysics available has been tested to see what works and what doesn't. Some deposits respond to everything others don't e.g. Telfer vs Havieron vs Calibre etc].
Calibre and Magnum have strong, ?similar responses although the shape and strength may vary. There are other "brown" irregular highs that may be of interest. If the drill testing shows economic grades at GAIP 20-1 this expensive and time consuming survey style may become a first pass tool for areas of "shallow cover" if it isn't already [ drilling of 2019 Gaip anomalies on the 100% ground will feed back into this idea].
Corker area - from memory pretty deep drill intersections which may not be amenable to Gaip and perhaps tested by earlier IP and follow up drilling.
S SSE of Calibre/Magnum has Gaip highs that look structurally dislocated plus may be on a similar trend to Cal/Mag. Infill? Compare to previous IP?.
I did an estimate (buried at the end of this post at the end of the pdf), sand dune constrained, of roughly how many line Kms would be required to cover the 2019 Gaip proposal at Citadel with approximately 1 Km line spacing. 500+ line Kms which Roger Mason said was never on the cards at that time (2019 AGM). Maybe get close if drill results warrant.
============ Serrano-Poblano-Reaper and Grey. IGO JV. I haven't looked at them much but they could be sleepers about to wake up with planned drilling. At the very least they indicate well mineralised system is present and wide spread. Not a surprising observation for the Paterson.. ====== Serendipity and exploration. How did NCM miss Havieron? They drilled 6 holes but none were effective over much more than 100+m in spite of being some 600+-m long due to the 400+m of cover. This is a rough representation of what it looks like in hindsight.
(20min delay)