pintohoo, you seem to live in an 'us' against 'them' fantasy, move on pal, I just pasted in the comments of the counsels assisting the inquiry, why don't you discuss those: comment more on
content
and a give me less rhetoric please.
Your 'left'/'right' distinctions and other ideologues notions can't serve us any longer as framework for political debate: I've read other posts of yours and you basically just keep tinting others as either some 'right wing', 'conservative', 'pro-trump' kind of fascists but the fact is that it is on his performance
as a Premier of Victoria
-
no matter where on the political spectrum he 's standing
- that he is being criticized and held accountable.
He has -
conveniently
- suspended parliament, now, is that a 'right' wing or a 'left' wing thing to do?
He's signed Victoria into a broad -
unbalanced
- 'co-operation' with a dictatorial regime, China, that keeps persecuting minorities and brutalises pro-democracy supporters, is that a 'right' wing or a 'left' wing things to do.
Victorians had their civil liberties suspended because of his executive stuff up, was his curfew 'progressive' enough for you?
FFS, GROW A BRAIN.
