its difficult to see how you can be a "fence sitter" when exhibiting such an obvious bias against Greenpeace and for the US government.
Both use emotional manipulation, the only difference being that Greenpeace is not funded by a tax on citizens.
Strange how you were unnerved by a tactic to bring genetic engineering of foods to your attention yet not unnerved by the tactic of using a potential of escalated global terror as a political tool.
