Share
3,312 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 51
clock Created with Sketch.
10/10/20
11:16
Share
Originally posted by acorn:
↑
Sorry old mate. Don't bother quoting stuff behind paywalls. You're wasting your time there. " The main game here is Victoria what Andrews and his incompetent ministers did or did not do. " Exactly. At this point we simply don't know who made the mistakes. That's why we have an inquiry. You people just want to sack someone. You don't care whether it's the right one. It's all just scoring political points for you. You couldn't give a continental about the people of Victoria. You haven't expressed any interest at all in getting to the nub of the problem so that we can make sure it never happens again. All we hear from you and the rest of the cubby house is " sack Andrews " blah, blah, blah. No interest at all in what went wrong with the contracts. No interest in knowing why there wasn't a standard quarantine protocol in place for decades. All you want is a political scalp because your inept , insipid opposition party is nowhere to be seen.
Expand
You clearly have the same view of accountability as Dan Andrews. It is a joke to say that the purpose of the inquiry is to learn why it happened so it doesn't happen again. None of the key "witnesses" have shown any curiosity whatsoever about getting to the truth. It has been a CYA activity, not a search for truth.