I think you will find Cornell as note holders had the right to appoint R&M, basically they take the assets to satisfy note holders first.
FH still remain as administrators.
In order for someone to appoint R&M they must have had priority or security, only one I can think of is Cornell.
Doesn't change much from shareholders perspective.
and ask the asx, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)