Nothing that wasn’t available through their latest presentation which indicates the last patient readout data should be in Q3 2021 I’m afraid. The criterion for the “Defining a Randomised, Controlled Study of Ortho-ATI (Trademark) vs Corticosteroid Injection for Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy and Tear”, as pointed out previously, was incredibly rigid which was why it has taken so long and why we have people questioning the validity of the study.
Minimum age: 30 Years
Maximum age: 65 Years
Gender: Both males and females
Key exclusion criteria
Corticosteroid or other treatment injection into the affected joint within 3 months of the first study visit.
Previous shoulder surgery or fracture on the affected side
Significant pathology of affected shoulder, that could, in the opinion of the Investigator, potentially compromise the outcome of treatment
Bilateral shoulder pathology
Active infection or systemic pathology including inflammatory joint disease, HIV, uncontrolled or poorly controlled diabetes, hepatitis or neoplastic disorders
Neuromuscular disease of the affected arm
Metabolic bone disorder which could impair bone or soft tissue function
Professional athlete
Workers compensation or other compensation case
Known hypersensitivity to the study treatment or its excipients or known relevant medication allergy
Contraindicated to MRI
Female participant who is pregnant or lactating
Known substance abuse
Participation in another study with an investigational product within 3 months of the first planned study visit
Concurrent medical condition which precludes the administration of study treatment or comparator
Other clinically significant disease (including psychological disorders), medical condition or other factor that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, compromise the safety of the participant or the outcome of the study
Key inclusion criteria
Participants must meet all of the following criteria:
Male or female between 30 and 65 years of age
Duration of symptoms > 6 months
Partial thickness, intra-substance supraspinatus tear without communication to the bursal or articular surface, that in the Investigator’s opinion, is of a sufficient size for treatment with Ortho-ATI (trademark), and is verified by MRI
Previously received one or more corticosteroid injections into the affected joint
Able to comply with the requirements of the protocol
Able to give informed consent or has legally acceptable representative who can give informed consent in accordance with ICH/GCP
Reading through that list you can begin to see why it’s taken so long to recruit subjects and why there's been so much debate about said trial being a failure when it fact it's still ongoing. A question that keeps popping up around here (not directed at you, Gracedu) is, "Why hasn't J&J bought/stepped-up/taken over/acquired Orthocell yet if ATi is as good as they claim?" Well that's akin to going through a series of job interviews and then asking the employer why you haven't been offered the job yet when you're only half way through the process. Something I’m going through right now. J&J asked to see the readout for 30 subjects, not 29, not 28, not 25, but 30. And they'll come to a conclusion once all the data is finalised.
For those new to OCC below is a brief summary of said trial.
“The objectives of treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff disease are to relieve pain and restore movement and function of the shoulder. Conservative treatments include rest, NSAIDs, glucocorticoid injections and physical therapy. While specific exercise therapy may be beneficial, most of these treatments often only temporarily relieve the patients’ symptoms, and do not address the underlying tendon pathology.
A combination of an increased understanding of pathological processes involved in tendinopathy as well as the success of other autologous therapies for tissue repair has highlighted the potential for tendon repair by delivery of tenocytes to the site of injury. Tendon-derived cells, including tendon progenitor cells (TPCs), possess the potential for tendon regeneration as they have the capacity for collagen synthesis, proliferate rapidly and are self-renewable.
The efficacy of tenocyte implantation for stimulation of tendon repair has been verified in a number of in vitro and animal studies. Animal studies have revealed that implantation of in vitro expanded autologous tenocytes improved the tendon structure and facilitated the healing process in both an acute tendon tear model and a chronic degenerative tendon disease model . Based on these studies, it was proposed that restoration of functional cells capable of synthesizing extracellular matrix and repairing the damaged tissue within the tendon may be an effective therapeutic strategy for tendon repair. This method is the basis of the Ortho-ATI (Trademark) tenocyte therapy product developed by Orthocell.
Imaging studies of rotator cuff tear indicate that injury to the supraspinatus tendon is most likely to be the cause of rotator cuff disease. The majority of supraspinatus tendon tears occur within a zone close to the tendon insertion. This is most likely due to lack of vascularity within that portion of tendon, and/or increased tensile loading. Furthermore, concealed lesions within the substance of the tendon (interstitial or intrasubstance tears) account for approximately one third of rotator cuff tears detected at the tendon insertion. These lesions present an unmet area of clinical need, as they are not suitable for surgical correction, should non-surgical treatments fail.
Ortho-ATI (Trademark) is a minimally-invasive treatment which, unlike other conservative treatments, directly addresses the underlying pathology of rotator cuff tendinopathy and tear. This randomised, controlled study has been designed to investigate the feasibility of Ortho-ATI (Trademark) as an alternative treatment for patients with partial, intrasubstance rotator cuff tear and tendinopathy.”
OCC Price at posting:
37.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held