Rudd petition exudes bulltish, page-24

You have zero credibility Lappy

Point 2 is accurate. The Age uncovered emails that showed Sutton received and replied to emails regarding private security arrangements for hotel quarantine. My speculation is that Dan's coverup inquiry didn't want to find them ... how is it that a judicial inquiry can't find basic evidence that journalists like Peta Credlin can?

Point 3 is also 100% accurate. The health depts lawyers wrote to the inquiry stating exactly this, they were instructed by Sutton not to forward those emails.

You can speculate that Sutton was honest but you can't argue that those facts are wrong. They are undeniable and 100% proven as accurate. You have zero credibility Lappy

For you to answer is why did Sutton try to hide these emails if he was being honest? An honest person would write to the inquiry telling them he'd found there were emails he received about this issue that he overlooked, instead he chose to try and cover it up.