Sure we have seen a number of other well known Australian companies go into administration in recent times, as a result of the downturn.
So why won't investors just accept the situation here...as per what the company say............that investments are lost.
There is a big difference in this PRECENDANT setting situation here.....whereby management are working with the banking group to keep the company fully operational - and at the same time, banks extract from the company, some 20% interest PA on these bank loans. All this without a shareholder vote,on such a major company restructure.
Should this be allowed to happen (20%PA interest)....one thing is for sure, nothing is left over for stakeholders, other than the banks.
Administration means a independant third party is appointed..... to look at all avenues to best service the companies obligations to ALL stakeholders.
A 20% PA interest charge....and the company continuing to operate, leaves a situation that is not acceptable.
Issues here may so far have got under the guard of regulators. Point is, as a note or shareholder of this company, I think you have every right to be upset, and accordingly look at all options availalble to you.
Exactly what I am doing, with much more to come.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BNB
- why are the issues so different here
BNB
babcock & brown limited
why are the issues so different here
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)