I think we are looking also at a tech pullback to the 50% level, before moving and onwards again. If so then $1.13 achievable fairly soon.
From an emotional perspective there will be concerns about launch failure, commissioning and quality of data - some people will take their money out and buy back in later if this all works as promised. The price differential will be their "insurance" cost.
I know a few folk have cited the benefits of 4 satellite clusters over 3 for accuracy etc. and I totally get that. But would that also mean that you have a higher risk of failure? If you only need 1 to fail then would that risk not rise the more satellites you stick in a cluster?
I'm not trying to be a negative Nelly (we hold a fair bundle of these and I am not thinking about selling, and I'm willing to pay more than Jan did!), I would like some informed feedback as to whether I am correct or not in my assertions. Perhaps satellite failure rates are so rare it doesn't matter.
Ann: KSS team complete preparations for Scouting Mission Launch, page-84
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?