Did they? I thought they told us they did not encounter anything that explains the DHEM survey results, though these survey results nonetheless have the characteristics of massive sulphides .... Can we interpret this as there is no nickel around? No, I don't think so.
If it smells like shit, looks like shit and is where shit is likely to be found, then fair chance shit will happen
“The results in MAD192 have not altered the interpretation of the presence in this area of very strong EM conductors with the characteristics of massive sulphides.
Ann: Drilling of Strong EM Conductors at Mt Alexander, page-43
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 182 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.71M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 770000 | 2.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4¢ | 129999 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.27pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGQ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable