Banks are generally not in the business of taking equity in companies. I know they have done it with BNB but this is a different scenario. BBI is a viable business with positive cashflows. BNB did not have that and the only reason the banks took equity in BNB was to screw the existing shareholders and BNBG holders so that any sale proceeds came to the banks.
Ann: Ceasing to be a substantial holder , page-55
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)