The yen effect is two way:
1. Yes it decreases the A$ NTA but
2. It decreases the current loss on the FX contracts. The capital hedge MTM on 31 Dec 2008 was A$86.4m of which A$68.7m is subject to review in August 2009.
In current circumstances it is effect (2) which is more important as this is a substantial potential cash call of 13c per share in August.
A very crude calculation of the FX effect on this MTM. The capital hedge was taken out at Y101.9, the MTM of -A$86.4m was calc at Y62.45. So each Y1 appreciation created an MTM loss of A$2.19m. So as the Yen now depreciates the MTM should decline by approx A$2.2m per Y1. So if the Yen ended the day at Y69.45, that should mean the FX loss on the capital hedges since the 31 Dec calc has decreased by around A$15.4m or 3c per share.
There are also distribution hedges in place but these are at lower Yen FX rates of between Y67.9 & Y71.9. So at current FX rates not material either way.
The effect (1) of the FX on NTA is clearly illustrated on p21 of the interim. Which shows an NTA of A$1.61 at Y70, & A$1.48 at Y80.
The whole concept of FX hedging is a total nonsense from what I can see, causing additional uncertainty, and as with GJT even threatening the viability of a company engaging in it.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BJT
- double banzai !
BJT
babcock & brown japan property trust
double banzai ! , page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BJT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham, MD & CEO
James Graham
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online