Thinking about it... it really depends whose costs are included in the "directly attributable platform costs". If that covers EM1's expenses, good for EM1. if that part covers TIM's expenses, that is bad for EM1.
Gross revenue (100)
Gross revenue - tax (100 - x) {Is this EM1's tax, or TIM's tax, or both?}
Gross revenue - tax - "directly attributable platform costs" DAPC (100 - x - y) = Net revenue "NR" {is the DAPC EM1's platform costs, or TIM's platform costs, or both?}
Em1's cut of net revenue = NR * 0.645
TIM's cut of net revenue = NR * 0.355
If the tax part covers EM1's tax, and if the platform costs part covers EM1's platform costs, then that is good. If these parts are taken out to only cover TIM's costs and not EM1's costs, then that is bad... Hope this makes sense?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP8
- Why is Miggster banned in Australia?
Why is Miggster banned in Australia?, page-63
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SP8 (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.054M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | $2.047K | 292.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 4279016 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.8¢ | 523176 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 4279016 | 0.007 |
7 | 4920000 | 0.006 |
5 | 2960000 | 0.005 |
3 | 6300000 | 0.004 |
2 | 1400000 | 0.003 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.008 | 523176 | 5 |
0.009 | 2145158 | 6 |
0.010 | 2035104 | 6 |
0.011 | 3175500 | 3 |
0.012 | 135607 | 2 |
Last trade - 12.25pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SP8 (ASX) Chart |