Hi Paulie
I have seen higher IGV's used for some of the bigger players. Also read FS's (I've got the original from BBY & others) notes just then, so makes sense if one were to use a higher IGV. That in itself would add a lot of value to the overall potential.
For the time being, I've been overly conservative with 0.20c-$1 IGV of the ore, & am happy with my calcs of 747.5-805MT (without Area A) or 850-991MT (with pre-drill estimates for Area A) for E47/882 only.
Add to that pre-drill fig's from E47/1560 of 121-164 MT, we have 971-1155 Billion Tons .
IMHO, once the estimate is public knowledge then we can use a higher multiple & ($2/4/5) for sure.
Quick question for u/others on this forum, where did u hear abt RIO mayb interested in the future, was it on the BRR/AFR or other sources in the media?
We know the rich neighbours & current interest around their blocks, so who knows, it could all come together later on.
cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RHK
- estimates
estimates, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RHK (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
75.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $149.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
75.0¢ | 76.0¢ | 75.0¢ | $7.462K | 9.894K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 7035 | 74.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
76.0¢ | 12268 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 7035 | 0.740 |
1 | 1309 | 0.700 |
2 | 65000 | 0.530 |
1 | 30000 | 0.510 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.760 | 12268 | 1 |
0.800 | 9022 | 1 |
0.810 | 2521 | 1 |
0.815 | 1358 | 1 |
0.870 | 1323 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RHK (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online