And it will be forever be zero and remain at step 1 as your logic suggests, for as long as ISX can make sure that the progress is delayed forever and the cases never reach court. If the cases never reach court then ISX would be forever suspended but forever innocent, right? Isn’t that the logic?
Now then, here is another question: What potential motivation does ISX have at delaying the court cases? Especially the ISX vs ASX one, 3 times already and counting. You can bet that something else will happen before February 2021. The answer is to make sure that it artificially stays innocent and keep people speculating. Do you believe that ISX does this to help you shareholders? No, of course not and you know this.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- ISX CEO - JOHN KARANTZIS v FAIRFAX MEDIA PUBLICATIONS (Mr Joe Aston)
ISX CEO - JOHN KARANTZIS v FAIRFAX MEDIA PUBLICATIONS (Mr Joe Aston), page-489
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 396 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)