hold excellent at fair price, page-13

'My statements may have been conclusive because I was relying on the information that was published, unlike most posters on fms (2 billion T of high grade ore, yeah right!!)'

The information published is not yet conclusive, so how can your statements be?

I think suggesting 2BT is a bit over the top, how many holders suggested that? There would likely be 2BT but would be cutoff 40%.

'I cannot be classed as a downramper, telling the truth from the known facts can not be considered as that surely.'

It's not the facts that are the problem, it's which ones you present and how that display your motivations, which in my opinion is downramping.

'The facts are:

The ore is low quality for the Pilbara, the company can call it high quality, as compared to other ore bodies around the world it may well be.

The ore is not DSO'

Parts of it could well be, some intersections assayed as such. Therefore I say this angle of yours is faulty and constitutes a downramp.

'The tenement is stranded, 400 klm's plus to the coast, sure they can say "We are close to world class export facilities" but I can park in Toorak, that doesn't make me rich or trendy!!'

RIO is making cash out of Fe next door. This statement not a downramp? Parking a Toorak Tractor in Toorak has a lot to do with iron ore. The car is made of it. That's where the analogy ends.

'No amount of dreaming will make the market want to buy fms.'

Sounds like you better stick with BHP.

'The amount of work and money that it will take to get the first saleable tonne to market is a lot more than you may think. Will this be kevin wellies next mxr??'

Anyone who has done an ounce of research will know the magnitude of dollars to bring something like this to production. This is not the only way forward. Why do you write in baby language BTW? eg: kevin wellies etc.

'As for how much you think you know me, well that would be guessing wouldn't it.'

Whatever you say chief.

'Please, attack what I say, not me, after all isn't that what you were benched the other day for ??'

I was benched for the ensuing argument from questioning a posters motives, which I believed to be not constructive and cowardly. I get upset especially by poster who appear to be overly cowardly, and believe they should be alerted to the possibility. If this means I will get moderated, so be it.

I will happily question your motives, as well as what you say, as IMO you have become a serial problem for FMS holders. Why should I believe that your intentions are honourable after 287 posts in 9 months on a stock that you regularly point out to be a joke?

Unsavoury people walk the earth. Not everyone is here to help, some are here to damage.

Many of your posts have been most educational and helpful, but the overwhelming majority IMO are downramps.