Ann: Confirmation of Legal Titles , page-29

Perhaps it had lapsed at some stage since that date trent, and when it was reissued to Fortitude had a new starting date?

No doubt it probably lapsed after that too though!!

What is attrocious is that Cityview have had to fund the renewal of licences for Fortitude with no increase in share holding to date.

Anyone in their right mind can see that this is not 'pocket money' they are talking about. It took a 100% dilution of Cityviews shareholding to LOAN money to Fortitude to make good their licences.

These are the areas that really need looking at - and the regulators should be asking why 'we' suddenly became the opressed minor shareholders with our wishes overturned at the EGM, because Titan Bay, Vohra and Kent could, in effect, donate money to pull Fortitude out of the hole.
When we look at this we must seriously note that Titan Bay and Kent share the same address in Belize as Fortitude.

Now, does anyone want to try and deny related party transactions?

Those talking to Smyth are welcome to ask him those questions. See what pitiful replies he can manage for you.