Dude relax it's a discussion. I don't agree with him I'm just making observations so I'd appreciate it if you stop trying to label me because I've caused a disturbance in your force! R U OK? What is it your definition of free speech then.....words that only agree with your own thought process ....it is free speech & propaganda. I made the mistake in my last post of saying propaganda instead of censorship but the gist was the same but you just didn't get it! Now I'm trying to incite violence by trying to explain the difference in censorship in comparison to closing down free speech. You think I'm ignorant which I can agree in the way I tried to explain it in the last so let me spell it out for you so you might understand better! What you have posted is propaganda however it is a point of view & personal plan of how to rid Palestine of "the zionist regime". It is not a direct call to arms to destroy a particular landmark or genocide of a particular race however a methodical step by step plan on how it should or could work. It mainly mentions peaceful referendums which if end up failing then the Palestinians should at least be armed with the same tools used by Israel. Where does it say "go wild now" or "fight like hell" & which landmark does it say to attack? It doesn't, so while you believe this should be censored the media platforms criteria for free speech does not. Had he presented a call to arms with a particular target....watch how fast the post would have been censored! If you can show me a post where he directly claims to cause harm with a particular targeted landmark then by all means I will eat my words otherwise you need to chill & live with the fact people can express their point of view whether you agree with it or not! Can you see you are arguing that the Donald is only using free speech so it should be OK however the ayatollah should be censored because you do not agree with it! I'm sure you understand the meaning of bias!
