You are very wrong miningnut. For evidence, see the average realized price - why is it about $150 less than average spot for the period. And if you think if the price is stable until the end, and they have had the negative revenue impact for 8 quarters, what exactly would they be paying on December 31, 2008? - they would have already "delivered" those ounces. Remember, the liability is being discharged over time, and this is evidenced by the timing of the hedging contracts - OGC is explicit in that the hedges are spread out evenly over the time frame. Think - how is a derivative liability calculated. Ounces under hedge X (actual gold price - discounted hedge gold price). So if you have less ounces and the price is stable, what happens - the liability REDUCES!!!!!!! How does this happen? You got it - credit to the income statement. You ONLY would be right if all the ounces were deliverable on December 31, 2010. That is not the case.
You need to research this a bit more....sorry, you are wrong.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- OGC
- running the numbers
running the numbers, page-12
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add OGC (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online