reasons for a bounce, page-12

Neovre,
Thanks for that spray.

I think you'll find there is a broader and far looser and misunderstood terminology than you think and hence the reason that certain 1P ratings in the US are only 2P ratings in AUS etc. And why one calls 2P Proven and another says its only Probable.....its both for example.

But anway, i was referring to the 3 Ps by my familiar explanation and considerning that you have not corrected the Writer for not writing the correct representations, i will take it that you dont know the version, so here:

1P is Proven
2P is Proven and Probable
3P is Proven, Probable and Possible.

For simplicity thats why its amount of P's are numerically stated as 1, 2 or 3 Ps.
Now you can breakdown those further into new definitions of what is Probable, Possible and Proven, but then you would be writing an honest thesis which is far from a quick, easy stab.

I wonder if you considered maybe that it was thrown in to see who reads and who cares only to be negative?
Other posters read it and i hope they took a few questions from ALL of my points and i hope they see positives as they are meritable.

But thise definitions i mentioned are according to whos reporting the US or AUS?

Please take a break Neovre, you are far too quick to grind your axe at me that you havent seen everything before you.

Respect,

Lautrec