Ann: Change of substantial holder increased from , page-13

re: Ann: Change of substantial holder increas... "I'd rather MAK pulled the bid under 50% and left BON to suffer the large UCL dilution or their own raising in due course (obviously this won't happen due to the shared directors)."

My sentiments exact. Then we would be able to see BON realise true/fair value, but somehow I dont think that would be favourable for BON's shareholders. Like I said before, cronyism has saved them but they still reckon they're being ripped off. Some people just don't realise when they're ahead.