antarctic ice shelf in peril as bridge snaps, page-135

HP, I get the distinct impression you are trying to put words in my mouth which I never actually said (or wrote, in this case). I think you'll find I wrote "climate change denier" which I believe is a fair statement. I do not recall ever writing "dirty climate change denier".

The article has some interesting points which I would like to think about in more detail when I get a chance. But I am not aware of any 'myth' (apart from maybe a slip-up by Tim Costello) that says AGW will cause more Tsunamis, so that one is a waste of newspaper column inches IMO. There is a prediction of increased extreme weather events due to AGW, which makes sense because there will be more energy in the atmosphere due to being at a slightly higher average temperature. But that is the only one that jumped out at me.

As for Andrew Bolt? He has a reputation. He has his fair share of detractors. There are a lot of people who do not take him seriously.