Si Capital Interview, page-25

Hi @mick z

I didn't get your email but I'm still interested if you could try again - seals70 at gmail dot com
Thanks!

I understand where you're coming from re increasing the size of the copper. I think the difference of opinion is because my assumptions were already out in front of this news. Based on everything to date, we already know of 3 workings, we also knew of a strike distance which is longer than the area mapped. So my first assumption was that we're looking at multiple lenses along the line of strike.

The drills they've chosen to map up are all constrained in between our holes 314RC and 307RC. They are then further constrained within the WME holes that are mapped up. So, we're zooming in with these holes, not out = no extension just additional confirmation of what I already considered to be there. Still useful data though and will certainly save money in guiding future drilling.

But that's not all the holes. FME 1-6 and 21- 22 look like they're all to the SW of what CCZ has mapped so that could be rightly called extension. Also they've only mapped hole 17 of the 4 vertical holes with 18 and 20 being in amongst holes 1-6 (SW). I'd to see all of them mapped up.