I guess that boils down to whether you beleive in the wording of the announcment where they said it was for unrelated reasons. I didn't think of them as hints. For all we know the hamsters may have had health issues meaning they aren't the correct candidates to accurately test. Who knows.
My understanding is that all testing is done by a third party, insinuating that the testing facility and rce are collaborating to give false and misleading statements about their testing is preposterous in my opinion. This would all come to light in further testing and ruin the reputation of the company. I am of the beleif it was for unrelated reasons as per the market announcment.
I agree they are confident because if we beleive the testing results they have all been very impressive, if the science is correct and the testing results are what the laboratory has reported back I don't see any reason for them not to be and to continue with further testing.
I haven't familiarised my self with the scope and run time of the sepsis testing so I cannot comment on the end of financial year.
I would how ever expect news on burns and sepsis before eofy (updates) but if not I won't immediately jump to the assumption the results are negative and a cover up is afoot if we don't have results of the tests.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)