Share
208 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 124
clock Created with Sketch.
15/02/21
15:39
Share
Originally posted by rainbowdaisy:
↑
hi None are those listed are the chemical grade ‘CG’ / battery grade ‘BG’ market product. What you have listed is the tech grade. And, what you have omitted is SC6.1 and SC6 (CG). Note ‘TG’ and ‘CG’ You’ll note the company’s information ( behind that letter to shareholders), here surpasses all peers for comparisona at time of publishing. (To Highlight the disregard for retail, this improvement overcomes LTR’s repeated use of a broken link in its PDF Corp presentations for a GB spod data source.) The referred to shareholder’s letter shows two versions of the BG SC6 product. Please note which ones. One is from Palith website (circa 2015 SC6.1 in the table) by General Lithium Corporation. The other from the TLH forum Prospectus link. HKEX IPO will also shows similar updated data. the palith PDF appears undated but based on its contents I’ve located it at circa 2015. So from 2012, to 2015, and 2018 we have a consistent little keyhole view of Talison’s SC statistics and yes Albermale’s TG data sheets. One of them, the palith one, is a breakthrough find, as no buyer of Talison SC6 in China has ever revealed this make up. it is shareholders on HC who have shone the torch on Talisons’ SC. IGO now has released updated info which would only show that grade of CG pits and i think TG pits is in slight decline (but still great comparatively) There’s more to discuss here on “selective mining” methodologies between FFX proposed and Talison’s in regards to its tailings (HKEX IPO pdf)
Expand
No omission, they were all the ones on the linked web page from the "shareholder’s letter on MET tests" you referred to.